February 2010


DTH PLAYERS UNDER MRTP SCANNER


 

The Competition Commission of India -CCI (which has replaced the MRTP) may soon issue showcause notices to leading Direct-to-Home (DTH) television operators for allegedly abusing dominant market position and not allowing users to change the operator, while retaining the hardware cost at about Rs 4,000.

"DTH operators have been found guilty of violating Sections 3 and 4 of the CCI Act. We will soon send them a notice, which is kind of a show cause, to which they would have to respond in 15 days. After that the Commission will take decision on what action to take against the operators," a senior official of the CCI said.

The move follows the Director General (Investigation) of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) having found DTH operators guilty of limiting consumer's option to choose one network, while using another company's set-top box by not making their STB's technically inter-operable.

"Since a Conditional Access Module (CAM) -- a card that facilitates feeds of one or more service provider to be read by STBs of another manufacturer -- is absent, the STBs are not technically inter-operable," the official said.

The DG in his findings added that DTH operators are not following the TRAI's guidelines according to which subscribers must be able to rent, hire or buy STBs.

The CCI, sources said, would decide on the quantum of penalty, if needed, after receiving response from operators.

According to the Competition Commission Act, companies violating sections 3 and 4 could be penalised to the maximum of 10% of the average turnover of the preceding 3 financial years. Sections 3 and 4 pertain to anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominance, respectively.

Last year, the Consumer Federation Online had filed a complaint against these DTH operators with the CCI, contending that the practice of not allowing interoperability of STBs is anti-competitive and against the interest of consumers.

In line with the international trend and to cope with the changing realities, India reviewed the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 and has instead enacted the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act) w.e.f 14 January 03. The Act seeks to repeal the M.R.T.P. Act and to dissolve the M.R.T.P. Commission, and replace it by the CCI. The CCI enquires into cases relating to Anti-Competitive Agreement, Abuse of Dominant position by an enterprise. n