|
January 2010
WHERE
ARE THE BIG BROADCASTERS !!?
Worldwide Some Of The Media
Companies Are The Largest Companies In Their Countries.
So How Come In India Only 3 Of The Companies Figure
On The Top 500 List – And That Too Nowhere At
The Top??
What Will It Take For The Cable & Satellite Segment
To Get There..?
Last
month the Economic Times released its version of the
Indian ‘Fortune 500’ list of companies.
The ET500 listed the
country’s top 500 companies in terms of turnover,
profits and market capitalization.
Surprisingly most of
the Indian broadcast houses don’t even figure
in the list.
The top 5 companies
are the same as last year’s list, with IOL, RIL,
Tata Steel, BPCL & HPCL.
So we scanned the list
of companies in the “Entertainment & Media”
category, then eliminated all of those from the print
media, and narrowed down to only the broadcast sector.
This industry sector
seems to figure way down under…!
The first media company
to figure is ZEE Entertainment, at rank no.214. An improvement
and a move up from last years rank of 230.
Zee TV achieved a billing
of Rs.2,337 crores , almost 20% higher than last year.
On this amount the company made a profit of Rs.512 Crores,
almost 33% higher than their profit for last year.
SUN TV Network lists
at a rank of 393; an improvement over its rank of 424
last year. It reported a sales turnover of Rs.1,106
Crores for the year ended March 2009, 19.4 percent more
than last year. Profit for the year is Rs.368 Crores,
almost 13 % more than last year.
The third company listed
at a rank of 463 is Network 18 Media & Investments,
coming in for the first time this year. It was not listed
in the top 500 last year. However, even in case of a
turnover of Rs. 887 Crores for the year ending March
2009, the company still made a loss of Rs.182 crores;
Of course, Star TV
India and Sony-MSM are not listed companies and so they
don’t find mention in this list.
While rumors of Sony,
now called MSM Discovery India Pvt Ltd, doing an IPO,
have been reported in various media for the past several
years, it does not seem imminent in the near future.
Star TV of course is
pretty content with its existing complex shareholding
structure, as well as indicating that it is firmly entrenched
as a market leader and does not need outside funding
for its activities.
The regional broadcasters
such as Asianet, Raj TV, ETV besides others, have lower
turnovers – not sufficient to reach the last rank
of Rs.805 crores, or are not interested in listing (though
there were talks that ETV was soon to offer shares and
list with venture capital funds).
In addition, the DTH
platforms are the other big guns as potential for figuring
in future lists, though not expected to be profitable
for many more years to come.
On the ground segment,
by the time this issue is printed, DEN will have already
listed itself after a public issue to raise funds.
The other MSO intending
to go public is the Raheja-owned Hathways Cable &
Datacom, which, we are informed, is in the process of
carrying out internal studies and meetings to arrive
at a valuation.
So what does this mean?
It would seem that
the broadcast sector is still a minnow among the various
industry sectors.
We seem to hog more airtime and square centimeters in
the media crowing about themselves, than the big bucks
in the stock markets!
FUTURE
COURSE OF ACTION FOR THE INDUSTRY
At the top, there does
seem to be more of a churn in the broadcasters organizations
than at the ground level with the MSOs.
The heads of all three
major broadcast platforms, Zee, Sony & Star have
changed in the last 24 months…. Several smaller
players have arisen to capture market share in selected
segments / programming categories and / or selected
territories. So where does this lead the big players?
The potential for income
growth within the GEC segment from advertising is close
to being maximized, unless the channels can come up
with some innovative ideas for new revenue generation
(this does not necessarily mean new program ideas alone).
Maybe the next round is to provide the same content
on the 3G platforms, or to push the government for digital
terrestrial television; possibly even a thrust in overseas
markets for syndication of the content – theres
a huge crowd of South Asians in all parts of the world.
The market is also
ripe for niche segments in channels; that is a possibility
that the bigger guns can look at.
GROWTH
STIMULATORS
With the new HITS policy
being announced, it is widely expected that penetration
of digital cable will grow in leaps & bounds. This
should result in the cable networks being able to get
better declarations of connectivity from their LMOs;
resulting in (hopefully) larger connectivity declarations
and therefore payments to the pay channel broadcasters.
The pay channels in
the long term will certainly see their subscription
revenues go up. So also the government should see their
service tax and entertainment tax collections also increase.
This will also lead
to the cable networks being capable of carrying a larger
number of channels to their subscribers. May even see
the beginning of the end of the ‘carriage fee’
regime…. Or at least a reduction in the trend.
This would then open
up avenues to launch the niche channels which are in
no position to pay the huge carriage fees demanded by
prime cable networks & MSOs currently.
Of course, a lot is
dependent on how much money is raised by the largest
of the MSOs …. and some of the new & upcoming
ones.
On the ground segment,
currently scouting for funds is Hathways, Digicable,
DEN and a few of the regional MSOs. Hopefully, the listing
of these companies on the stock exchanges will bring
in a greater degree of transparency in their dealing
and their financials. For example, it is a well known
fact that most MSOs accept the carriage fee not in their
principal company’s name, but in some other ancillary
company of financial vehicle. The carriage fee represents
a substantial part of the income of any MSO. Thus the
bottom line may / may not reflect the actual carriage
fee collected annually. The cable networks will have
to add to the bottomline to show substantial growth
of their incomes.
This however is unlikely
to happen since the cash cows are closely held and funds
‘adjusted’ over the several companies /
organization owned by the promoters. This has got to
change. The ground segment still has a long way to go
to professionalise operations and carry out the exercise
to provide accurate connectivity reports.
IN
CONCLUSION
In all likelihood,
there are several companies in the satellite & cable
sector that are over the 800 crore turnover figures.
However, being closely held, or family owned, these
companies do not necessarily provide for full declarations
of their incomes.
Or in some cases they
do have the turnover, but are simply not bothered about
listing or publicizing the same.
In case these companies
decide to do so, this ET500 list would see a major change!!
n
|